Why I don't like quackery
I often have arguments with friends and rivals about whether or not I should just leave quacks alone. If people want to believe in stuff that is evidently nonsense, I am told, I should exercise a restraint and aodpt a live and let live attitude. Afterall, if people want to believe that they can live on air alone, or that they can attain immortality by paying the Church of Scientology lots of money, or that crystals have healing power ( beyond paying the crystal salesperson's debt), what is it to me? Why not just let them live in ignorance? When did a little benign fantasy ever do anyone any harm?
The point is, tho, that cults ( religious and otherwise) are far from being harmless. Remember Jim Jones, and the Jonestown massacre? Or the Heaven's Gate cult? Faddish cults lure unsuspecting people in and then, before you know it, you have a bunch of corpses on your hands because some nutjob thought that God told him to make everybody drink poisoned coolaid. Groups like the Scientologists are even worse- in every country where this bunch of lunatics have put down roots, they are facing lawsuits. As a matter of policy, the Churhc uses the sorts of tactics that would make Heinrich Himmler cream in his shorts (www.xenu.net).
Aside from the immediate danger that irrational groups pose, there is long term damage that originates with those who value flash over substance. Every aromatherapist who has ever uncorked a vile has contributed to the idea that it is okay to behave irrationally. Is it any wonder that we live during one of the dumbest eras in our planets history? Every nonsensical fashion creates the impression that we need not live our lives according to rational dictates.
